The Official Journal of the Turkish Society Of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (KLİMİK)

Original Article

Risk Factors for Mortality in Patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bloodstream Infections in Immunocompetent Patients

Şirin Menekşe
×Affiliations
  • Infection Control Unit, Kartal Koşuyolu High Speciality Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
,
Ece Altınay
×Affiliations
  • Department of Anesthesia, Kartal Koşuyolu High Speciality Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
,
Halide Oğuş
×Affiliations
  • Department of Anesthesia, Kartal Koşuyolu High Speciality Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
,
Çiğdem Kaya
×Affiliations
  • Infection Control Unit, Kartal Koşuyolu High Speciality Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
,
Mehmet Emirhan Işık
×Affiliations
  • Infection Control Unit, Kartal Koşuyolu High Speciality Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
,
Kaan Kırali
×Affiliations
  • Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kartal Koşuyolu Heart and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey

Abstract

Objective:  This study aimed to evaluate bloodstream infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in immunocompetent patients with respect to clinical features and risk factors for mortality.

Methods: We reviewed bloodstream infections detected between January 1, 2012, and July 1, 2021, to identify nosocomial S. maltophilia bacteremia in Koşuyolu Research and Training Hospital.

Results: We identified a total of 97 patients with S. maltophilia bloodstream infections. Of these, 17 patients were excluded because of community-acquired infections (n=9), contamination with S. maltophilia (n=3), and insufficient data (n=5), with 80 (57.5% males) patients remaining for analysis. The source of infection was the respiratory tract in 28 (35%) patients. A central venous catheter was used in 60 (75%) patients, which required replacement in 23 patients within five days after detecting S. maltophilia bacteremia. On antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 71 strains were found to be susceptible and 9 (11.3%) resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Thirty-day mortality was 33.8%. Non-survivors differed significantly from survivors with respect to higher rates of central venous catheters (p=0.020), mechanical ventilation (p=0.006), urinary catheters (p=0.021), septic shock (p=0.001), hypoalbuminemia (p=0.026) and thrombocytopenia (p=0.039). S. maltophilia bacteremia was independently associated with mortality in patients with hypoalbuminemia, and replacement of central venous catheters had a protective role in reducing mortality.

Conclusion: As with other bacterial infections, S. maltophilia bacteremia is associated with a considerably high mortality rate in patients with cardiac conditions. The replacement of the catheter seems to play a beneficial role in 30-day survival.

Keywords: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, bloodstream infections, mortality

Highlights

    • Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia is of concern not only in patients with malignancies but also in critically ill patients with several comorbidities with a high mortality rate.
    • Thirty-day mortality was 33.8% in S. maltophilia bacteremia.
    • The replacement of the central venous catheter seems to play a beneficial role in 30-day survival.
    • S. maltophilia bacteremia was independently associated with mortality in patients with hypoalbuminemia.

Introduction

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a Gram-negative, non-fermentative aerobic bacterium that infects patients, especially with severe comorbidities such as hematological malignancies. It is commonly found in the environment and hospital settings. The most common clinical presentations are pneumonia and bloodstream infections (1, 2). 

S. maltophilia is known to have intrinsic resistance mechanisms to many antibiotic classes, including carbapenems, aminoglycosides, most third-generation cephalosporins, and other β-lactams, making it difficult to determine the appropriate antibiotic treatment (1, 2). For example, although  trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is the first-line treatment, resistance to this drug has been reported at a rate of 2.1-47.1% in different reports (2-8).

S. maltophilia-associated mortality rates vary widely from 16 to 69% in the literature, depending on the coexisting conditions (1, 4-6, 8-13). The majority of studies have been conducted on patients with hematological malignancies or pediatric patients. Therefore, we evaluated bloodstream infections caused by S. maltophilia in immunocompetent patients with respect to clinical features and risk factors for mortality.

Materials and Methods

Hospital Settings

This retrospective study was performed in Koşuyolu Research and Training Hospital, a 465-bed tertiary referral center in İstanbul, Turkey, with three intensive care units (ICU) (adult cardiovascular surgical ICU, pediatric cardiovascular surgical ICU, coronary ICU) as well as cardiovascular surgery clinics (one for pediatric cardiovascular surgery), gastroenterology surgery clinic, transplantation clinic, and cardiology clinics. 

The institutional review board of Koşuyolu Research and Training Hospital approved the study on January 12, 2022, with the decision number of 2022/530. 

Patients

We reviewed bloodstream infections detected between January 1, 2012, and July 1, 2021, to identify nosocomial S. maltophilia bacteremia. Patients who were 16 years of age or older and had complete hospital data were included. Those who had community-acquired bloodstream infections were excluded. 

Data Retrieval

Electronic medical records and infectious diseases charts were searched for patients’ demographic data, comorbidities, history of ICU admission, hospital setting at the time of detection of bacteremia, antibiotic therapies prior to and after the detection of bacteremia, presence of central venous or urinary tract catheters and mechanical ventilation support and development of septic shock. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores were calculated in ICU patients during the detection of  S. maltophilia bacteremia (SMB). 

Microbiological Testing

Blood samples were cultured using the BACT/ALERT® 3D automated microbial detection system (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France). All clinical isolates were identified, and susceptibility to TMP-SMX was determined using the automated VITEK® 2 Compact system that utilizes GN ID cards (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France). Results were interpreted according to the identification criteria set for S. maltophilia by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST).

Definitions 

Nosocomial SMB was defined as the detection of S. maltophilia in blood samples obtained at least 48 hours after admission due to clinical symptoms. Contamination with S. maltophilia was defined as patients who had no symptoms of systemic infection and had no growth in the control blood cultures performed without initiation of antibacterial therapy active against S. maltophilia. The source of bacteremia was determined according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definitions (14). Simultaneous detection of bacteremia because of other pathogens before or after 24 hours of the identification of S. maltophilia was defined as polymicrobial bacteremia. Septic shock was defined by the presence of sepsis complicated by persistent hypotension requiring vasopressor agents to maintain a mean arterial pressure of 65 mm Hg (15). 

Thrombocytopenia was defined as a platelet count of less than 150,000/mL and hypoalbuminemia as an albumin level of less than 3 g/dL at the time of bacteremia. Appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy was defined as the administration of an antimicrobial agent initiated intravenously and in an appropriate dosage (TMP-SMX, 15 mg/kg/day based on TMP component) within 24 hours of the onset of S. maltophilia bacteremia and was shown to be effective against S. maltophilia isolates grown in blood cultures. Appropriate definitive antibiotic therapy was defined as initiating an antimicrobial agent intravenously and in an appropriate dosage (TMP-SMX, 15 mg/kg/day based on TMP component) based on positive cultures and susceptibility results.  The replacement of the central venous catheter (CVC) was defined as the procedure performed no later than five days after the onset of bacteremia. Mortality was defined as death occurring within 30 days after the detection of SMB. 

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data of the non-survival and the survival groups were compared. Continuous variables were expressed as means (standard deviation, SD), and categorical variables were expressed as numbers (percentage). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to analyze the normality of the distribution of parameters. Data that did not show a normal distribution were expressed as a median with the interquartile range (IQR). The nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare numerical data, and the chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical data. 

The effects of variables on mortality were evaluated using univariate (Kaplan–Meier) and multivariate analyses. All variables with a p-value of less than 0.05 in the univariate analyses were included in the multivariate analyses. Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the factors associated with 30-day mortality. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Patients

We identified a total of 97 patients with SMB. Of these, 17 patients were excluded because of  community-acquired infections (n=9), contamination with S. maltophilia (n=3), and insufficient data (n=5), with 80 (57.5% males) patients remaining for analysis. The mean age was 54.9±16.5 (ranges: 16-87) years, and 23 patients were older than 65 years of age. The most common comorbid diseases were hypertension (55%), followed by diabetes mellitus (42.5%), and congestive heart failure (27.5%). Seventy-one patients had a history of ICU admission either before or after the detection of bacteremia. The median length of hospitalization was 60 (IQR 28-101) days, and the median duration of hospitalization before identification of S. maltophilia was 28.5 (IQR 16.3-51.3) days (Table 1).

At the time of diagnosis of SMB, 54 patients had a fever (≥ 38 °C), nine had hypothermia, 22 had respiratory symptoms, and 22 were in septic shock (Table 1). The majority of patients (n=58) had been receiving antimicrobial therapy before the identification of S. maltophilia (Table 1).  

Thirteen patients had polymicrobial infections caused by Enterococcus spp. (n=4), Acinetobacter baumannii (n=3), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=2), Candida spp. (n=2), Sphingomonas paucimobilis (n=1) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (n=1).

Source of Infection

The source of infection was the respiratory tract in 28 (35%) patients. A CVC was used in 60 (75%) patients, which required replacement in 23 patients within five days after detecting SMB (Table 1).

In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility

On antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 71 strains were susceptible, and nine were resistant to TMP-SMX (11.3%) (Table 1). 

Risk Factors Associated with 30-Day Mortality 

Table 1. Overall demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with S. maltophilia bacteremia.

Thirty-day mortality was 33.8%. Non-survivors differed significantly from survivors with respect to higher rates of CVCs (p=0.020), mechanical ventilation (p=0.006), urinary catheters (p=0.021), septic shock (p=0.001), hypoalbuminemia (p=0.026) and thrombocytopenia (p=0.039). The median APACHE II scores were 24.5 and 12 in the non-survivor and survivor groups, respectively (p<0.001). The incidence of an APACHE II score of >20 was remarkably higher among non-survivors as compared with survivors (85.2% vs 9.4%, p=0.001) as well as the incidence of a procalcitonin level of  >1 ng/mL (50.0% vs 15.8%, p=0.009). The incidence of catheter replacement was also higher among survivors (p=0.001) (Table 1). 

Table 2. Univariate and multivariate analysis of risk factors associated with 30-day mortality in patients with S. maltophilia bacteremia.

Figure 1. The effect of survival rate among the patients with and without replacement of Central Venous Catheter (p=0.001).

Tablo 2 summarizes the results of univariate and multivariate analyses for 30-day mortality. Eight variables were found to be significantly associated with mortality in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, only two variables were independently associated with mortality, including hypoalbuminemia and replacement of CVCs. The Kaplan-Meier curve was plotted to estimate the effect of replacement of CVC on survival (Fig. 1). The survival rate among the patients with CVC replacement was higher than the patients who has no CVC replacement.

Discussion

Our results showed that S. maltophilia bacteremia was independently associated with mortality in patients with hypoalbuminemia, and replacement of CVCs had a protective role in reducing mortality. The majority of studies on the risk factors of S. maltophilia-associated mortality were performed in patients with hematological malignancies or the pediatric age group. The present study differs in this respect in that all the participants were hospitalized for cardiac causes, and none had hematological malignancies or were in the pediatric age group.  

S. maltophilia-associated mortality rates vary widely from 16 to 69% in the literature, depending on the coexisting conditions (1, 4-6, 8, 10-13). In the present study, 30-day mortality among patients with cardiac conditions was 33.8%. 

Understandably, the removal or replacement of CVCs would have a beneficial role in mortality because CVCs represent a suitable environment for biofilm formation (13). In line with previous studies addressing the preventive role of CVC removal (6, 8, 12), the rate of CVC replacement was significantly higher among survivors than among non-survivors (Table 1). 

Hypoalbuminemia represents a complicating factor in the setting of SMB infections and adversely affects survival (13). In the current study, the incidence of hypoalbuminemia was significantly higher among non-survivors than among survivors (88.9% vs. 62.3%). It is known that hypoalbuminemia is often observed in patients with sepsis; it may increase the risk of infections and mortality in critically ill patients.  Moreover, albumin is a negative acute phase reactant.  However, the causal relation is not known despite such an association (16).

Appropriately empirical antibiotic use remains challenging in the presence of suspected bacterial infections, particularly for S. maltophilia. Inappropriate empirical antimicrobial treatment was reported to be an independent risk factor for mortality in S. maltophilia infections (5, 10). Conversely, the appropriateness of either empirical (8, 12) or definitive (12) antimicrobial therapy has been reported to be unrelated to mortality. In the current study, the rate of empirical antibiotic therapy with TMP-SMX might be beyond expectations, possibly owing to an increased awareness of S. maltophilia infections at our institution, particularly heightened by the emergence of an S. maltophilia outbreak recently reported by the authors (17). Our findings showed that the survivor and non-survivor groups did not differ significantly with respect to the use of either appropriate empirical or definitive antibiotic therapy (Table 1). 

The retrospective study design and relatively small patient size are the main limitations of the present study.

In conclusion, as with other bacterial infections, S. maltophilia bacteremia is associated with a considerably high mortality rate in patients with cardiac conditions. Hypoalbuminemia is associated with mortality.  The catheter replacement seems to play a beneficial role in 30-day survival.

Ethical Approval: The study was approved by the Koşuyolu Research and Training Hospital Review Board on January 12, 2022, with the decision number of 2022/530.

Informed Consent: N/A.

Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed

Author Contributions: Concept – Ş.M.; Design – Ş.M.; Supervision – Ş.M.; Fundings – Ş.M., E.A., H.O., Ç.K., M.E.K., K.K.; Materials – Ş.M., E.A., H.O., Ç.K., M.E.K., K.K.; Data Collection and/or Processing – Ş.M., E.A., H.O., Ç.K., M.E.K., K.K.; Analysis and/or Interpretation – Ş.M., E.A., H.O., Ç.K., M.E.K., K.K.; Literature Review – Ş.M., E.A., H.O., Ç.K., M.E.K., K.K.; Writer – Ş.M., E.A., H.O., Ç.K., M.E.K., K.K.; Critical Reviews – Ş.M., E.A., H.O., Ç.K., M.E.K., K.K.

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Financial Disclosure: There are no financial conflicts of interest to disclose.

Show References

References

  1. Mojica MF, Humphries R, Lipuma JJ, Mathers AJ, Rao GG, Shelburne SA, et al. Clinical challenges treating Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections: an update. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022;4(3):dlac040. [CrossRef]
  2. Brooke JS. Advances in the microbiology of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2021;34(3):e0003019. [CrossRef]
  3. Garazi M, Singer C, Tai J, Ginocchio CC. Bloodstream infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a seven-year review. J Hosp Infect. 2012;81(2):114-8. [CrossRef]
  4. Hamdi AM, Fida M, Abu Saleh OM, Beam E. Stenotrophomonas Bacteremia Antibiotic Susceptibility and Prognostic Determinants: Mayo Clinic 10-Year Experience. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020;7(1):ofaa008. [CrossRef]
  5. Kanchanasuwan S, Rongmuang J, Siripaitoon P, Kositpantawong N, Charoenmak B, Hortiwakul T, et al. Clinical characteristics, outcomes, and risk factors for mortality in patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia. J Clin Med. 2022;11(11):3085. [CrossRef]
  6. Gokhan Gozel M, Celik C, Elaldi N. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections in adults: primary bacteremia and pneumonia. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015;8(8):e23569. [CrossRef]
  7. Gajdács M, Urbán E. Epidemiological trends and resistance associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia: a 10-year retrospective cohort study in a tertiary-care hospital in Hungary. Diseases. 2019;7(2):41. [CrossRef]
  8. Tuncel T, Akalın H Sr, Payaslıoğlu M, Yılmaz E, Kazak E, Heper Y, et al. Healthcare-associated Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteraemia: retrospective evaluation of treatment and outcome. Cureus. 2021;13(10):e18916. [CrossRef]
  9. Paez JI, Costa SF. Risk factors associated with mortality of infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect. 2008;70(2):101-8. [CrossRef]
  10. Bao H, Qiao Y, Liu D, Chen J, Wu X, Hu X, et al. The clinical impact of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia on the 30-day mortality rate in patients with hematologic disorders: a single-institution experience. Infection. 2020;48(2):205-12. [CrossRef]
  11. Chen Y, Suo J, Du M, Chen L, Liu Y, Wang L, et al. Clinical features, outcomes, and risk factors of bloodstream infections due to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in a rertiary-care hospital of China: a retrospective analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:4931501. [CrossRef]
  12. Jeon YD, Jeong WY, Kim MH, Jung IY, Ahn MY, Ann HW, et al. Risk factors for mortality in patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(31):e4375. [CrossRef]
  13. Kim EJ, Kim YC, Ahn JY, Jeong SJ, Ku NS, Choi JY, et al. Risk factors for mortality in patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia and clinical impact of quinolone-resistant strains. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):754. [CrossRef]
  14. CDC/NHSN Surveillance Definitions for Specific Types of Infections, January 2022 [Internet]. National Health Safety Network (NHSN). (cited July 11, 2022). Available from:     https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/17pscnosinfdef_current.pdf
  15. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-10. [CrossRef]
  16. Frenkel A, Novack V, Bichovsky Y, Klein M, Dreiher J. Serum albumin levels as a predictor of mortality in patients with sepsis: a multicenter study. Isr Med Assoc J. 2022;24(7):454-9.
  17. Menekşe Ş, Tanrıverdi ES, Oğuş H, Altınay E, Kaya Ç, Çağlayan E, et al. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia outbreak with a commercial blood gas injector as the culprit and interventions for source and prevention: A possible passage between patient and ECMO water heater device. Am J Infect Control. 2022:S0196-6553(22)00537-5. [CrossRef]