Case Report

Fasciola hepatica in the Differential Diagnosis of a Patient with Obstructive Jaundice and Eosinophilia

Necati Mumcu
×Affiliations
  • Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Iğdır State Hospital, Iğdır, Turkey
,
Celal İdemen
×Affiliations
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Iğdır State Hospital, Iğdır, Turkey
,
Serkan Cerrah
×Affiliations
  • Department of Gastroenterology (Internal Medicine), Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey
,
İbrahim Uysal
×Affiliations
  • Department of Radiology, Iğdır State Hospital, Iğdır, Turkey

Abstract

Fasciola hepatica is a trematode that is visible to the naked eye. The diagnosis can be made by serology or by clinical improvement and decrease of eosinophilia after triclabendazole treatment or by finding parasite eggs in the stool. Sometimes the diagnosis is possible during unnecessary surgery, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). F. hepatica infection should be considered in patients with typical clinical findings; the elevation of liver enzymes indicating cholestasis, eosinophilia, and characteristic computed tomography (CT) or ultrasonography (USG) findings. Here, we presented a case with the preliminary diagnosis of choledocholithiasis and diagnosed with F. hepatica infection by ERCP procedure.

Keywords: Fasciola hepatica, obstructive jaundice, eosinophilia

Introduction

Although Fasciola hepatica infects sheep and cattle, it can sometimes be an accidental host in humans (1). Clinically, fever, abdominal pain, intermittent jaundice, intrahepatic cystic abscess, eosinophilic cholecystitis, and extrahepatic cholecystitis are seen most frequently (2). The diagnosis can be made by serology or by clinical improvement and improvement of eosinophilia after triclabendazole treatment or by finding parasite eggs in the stool. This case report aims to raise awareness of the diagnosis of F. hepatica infection and reduce unnecessary invasive procedures.

Case Presentation

Figure 1. Live Fasciola hepatica during the ERCP procedure.

Figure 2. Live Fasciola hepatica during the ERCP procedure.

A 56-year-old female patient presented with complaints of fatigue, nausea, and abdominal pain for the last four months. Her initial biochemical analysis revealed the following findings: Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 49 U/L (reference interval [RI]: 0-40), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 129 U/L  (RI: 0-41), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) 356 U/L (RI: 40-130), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) 171 U/L (RI: 6-42); total bilirubin 3 mg/dl (RI: 0.1-1.2), direct bilirubin 2 mg/dl (RI: 0-0.3), white blood cell (WBC) count 13,140 mm3 (RI: 4-11×103), and eosinophils 28% (RI: 0-5). No pathological image was detected in the abdominal ultrasonography (USG). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) revealed sludge with leveling in the distal common bile duct (choledocholithiasis). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was then performed, where a live F. hepatica was seen at the distal end of the common bile duct (Figure 1, 2). Triclabendazole 10 mg/kg was given in 2 doses. Laboratory parameters and clinical findings were improved during the follow-up period.

Discussion

Fascioliasis is a rare parasitic infection that spreads mostly in tropical, subtropical, and temperate climate regions and is frequently reported in countries where sheep and cattle raising is common (3). F. hepatica is endemic to Europe and Asia. It is rarely seen in North Africa, Central and South America, and the Middle East. It is seen sporadically in the USA and the Caribbean Region (1). In six studies reported from different provinces of Turkey, the prevalence of F. hepatica ranged from 0.79-10.3%, which indicated that F. hepatica infection was not rare in our country (4-9).

The disease is divided into two main stages as acute and chronic (2). The acute phase (liver period) appears 3-5 months after the infection. It is the period when the immature forms of the parasite are in the duodenum and try to reach the liver; they finally pass into the bile ducts. During this period, the most common symptoms are fever, abdominal pain, severe anemia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, weight loss, urticaria, lymphadenopathies, and arthralgia. Interestingly, there is no hyperbilirubinemia at this stage. Hepatomegaly and eosinophilia are the most common physical examination and laboratory findings (2).

The chronic phase (bile duct period) begins after about the sixth month and is the period when the parasites mature in the bile ducts. This stage can last several years (>10 years), and half of the patients are asymptomatic. In symptomatic patients, upper abdominal pain, intermittent jaundice, intrahepatic cystic abscess with prolonged fever, eosinophilic cholecystitis, extrahepatic cholecystitis (high AST, ALT, GGT, and total bilirubin) may be seen. About half of the patients do not have eosinophilia during this stage. Therefore, the number of eosinophils does not exclude the diagnosis (2). In the case presented here, the parasite was in the common bile duct, and the patient was symptomatic. The patient had symptoms of weakness, nausea, abdominal pain, and signs of extrahepatic cholecystitis and eosinophilia.

The diagnosis of fascioliasis may be missed because of many options for differential diagnoses and low incidence of the infection (10). The differential diagnosis of F. hepatica includes liver abscess, malignancy, viral hepatitis, cholecystitis, cholangitis, ruptured hydatid cyst, toxocariasis, acute schistosomiasis, ascariasis, and strongyloidiasis (1, 11-13). Serology has been the fastest and most effective diagnostic method in the diagnosis of fascioliasis in recent years (1). In the literature, it is stated that the sensitivity and specificity of this method are 78.9-100% and 97%, respectively (14, 15). Antibodies are detectable 2 to 4 weeks after initial exposure, undetectable in approximately 65% of patients one month after successful treatment, but low levels of positive titers may persist in some patients for years (1). A serological test could not be performed in this case because there was no serological test option in our hospital. Stool microscopy is another useful diagnostic method still used to diagnose chronic infections in countries with scarce resources. In the acute phase of infection, there are no eggs in the stool. An adult F. hepatica parasite can lay more than 20,000 eggs per day. Because this release is intermittent, multiple stool samples should be examined (1). In the liver, multiple nodular or irregular lesions with different echogenicity can be seen on USG, and multiple metastasis-like lesions can be seen on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Sometimes the diagnosis can be made during unnecessary surgery, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and ERCP (2). In a patient with biliary obstruction, ERCP can detect the adult F. hepatica parasite in the biliary tract. In addition, F. hepatica can be identified in open surgical operations and biopsies performed for diagnostic purposes (1). In the case presented here, the sludge that leveled the distal common bile duct was detected by MRCP. ERCP was performed on the patient with a preliminary diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. The diagnosis of fascioliasis was made by the presence of a live F. hepatica parasite at the distal end of the common bile duct during the ERCP procedure. Appropriate treatment for both stages of infection is triclabendazole 10 mg/kg, given in two doses, and its efficacy is 90% (1).

Conclusion

The non-specific clinical manifestation of fascioliasis is one of the difficulties in its diagnosis. Due to overlooking of F. hepatica infection in the preliminary diagnosis and insufficient use of proper diagnostic methods, the cases are usually misdiagnosed as a primary or metastatic liver tumors with abdominal imaging. As a result, invasive procedures and even open surgical operations were applied to the cases for diagnostic purposes, which is unacceptable for the patient and the health system as it brings an economic burden to the country. Therefore, F. hepatica infection should be considered before performing a major surgical intervention in patients with typical clinical findings, the elevation of liver enzymes indicating cholestasis, eosinophilia, and characteristic CT or USG findings, and non-invasive diagnostic methods should be used first.

Ethical Approval: N.A.

Informed Consent: Written consent was obtained from the patient.

Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed

Author Contributions: Concept – N.M., C.İ., S.C., İ.U.; Design – N.M., C.İ., S.C., İ.U.; Supervision – N.M., C.İ., S.C., İ.U.; Materials – N.M., C.İ., S.C., İ.U.; Data Collection and/or Processing – N.M., C.İ., S.C., İ.U.; Analysis and/or Interpretation – N.M., C.İ., S.C., İ.U.; Literature Review – N.M.; Writer – N.M.; Critical Reviews – N.M., C.İ., S.C., İ.U.

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

Show References

References

  1. Good R, Scherbak D. Fascioliasis. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing.  (updated May 8, 2022; cited February 18, 2022). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537032/
  2. Akdeniz H. [Doku Helmintleri]. In: In: Willke Topçu A, Söyletir G, Doğanay M, editors. [Enfeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Mikrobiyolojisi]. 4th ed. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; 2017. p. 2298-9. Turkish.
  3. Bassily S, Iskander M, Youssef F, el-Masry N, Bawden M. Sonography in diagnosis of fascioliasis. The Lancet. 1989;333(8649):1270-1. [CrossRef]
  4. Ozturhan H, Emekdaş G, Sezgin O, Korkmaz M, Altintaş E. Seroepidemiology of Fasciola Hepatica in Mersin province and surrounding towns and the role of family history of the Fascioliasis in the transmission of the parasite. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2009;20(3):198-203. [CrossRef]
  5. Şahin İ, Yazar S, Yaman O. [Prevalance of Fasciola hepatica among people living in Kayseri-Karpuzsekisi basin]. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2008;17(2):97-103. Turkish.
  6. Yılmaz H, Gödekmerdan A. Human fasciolosis in Van province, Turkey. Acta Trop. 2004;92(2):161-2. [CrossRef]
  7. Şeker Y. [The investigation of Fasciola hepatica antibodies with serological method on human who live in Residental Area of Adana] [MSc thesis]. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2005. Turkish.
  8. Demirci M, Korkmaz M, Kaya S, Kuman A. Fascioliasis in eosinophilic patients in the Isparta region of Turkey. Infection. 2003;31(1):15-8. [CrossRef]
  9. Kaplan M, Kuk S, Kalkan A, Demirdağ K, Ozdarendeli A. [Fasciola hepatica seroprevalence in the Elazığ region]. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2002;36(3-4):337-42. Turkish.
  10. Mas-Coma MS, Esteban JG, Bargues MD. Epidemiology of human fascioliasis: a review and proposed new classification. Bull World Health Organ. 1999;77(4):340-6.
  11. Lim JH, Mairiang E, Ahn GH. Biliary parasitic diseases including clonorchiasis, opisthorchiasis and fascioliasis. Abdom Imaging. 2008;33(2):157-65. [CrossRef]
  12. Kabaalioğlu A, Cubuk M, Şenol U, Cevikol C, Karaali K, Apaydin A, et al. Fascioliasis: US, CT, and MRI findings with new observations. Abdom Imaging. 2000;25(4):400-4. [CrossRef]
  13. Yazgan-Aksoy D, Kerimoğlu U, Oto A, Ergüven S, Arslan S, Unal S, et al. Fasciola hepatica infection: clinical and computerized tomographic findings of ten patients. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2006;17(1):40-5.
  14. Apt W, Aguilera X, Vega F, Miranda C, Zulantay I, Perez C, et al. Treatment of human chronic fascioliasis with triclabendazole: drug efficacy and serologic response. Am J of tropical medicine and hygiene. 1995;52(6):532-5. [CrossRef]
  15. Shaheen HI, Kamal KA, Farid Z, Mansour N, Boctor FN, Woody JN. Dot-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (dot-ELISA) for the rapid diagnosis of human fascioliasis. J Parasitol. 1989;75(4):549-52.